|
25 May 2005 |
|
http://www.infozine.com/news/stories/op/storiesView/sid/7979/ |
|
Yesterday the New York Times in its lead editorial criticizes plans for U.S. weapons in space. National Washington, D.C. - Institute for Public Accuracy - infoZine - Last Wednesday the paper reported that the Air Force is seeking a presidential directive that could strengthen military uses of space. David Wright is a physicist and co-director of the Global Security program at the Union of Concerned Scientists. He co-wrote a recently-released report published by the American Academy of Arts and Sciences titled "The Physics of Space Security: A Reference Manual." He said yesterday: "Recent reporting in the New York Times confirms what experts at the Union of Concerned Scientists already knew. There are people in the Air Force and Washington policy circles who see space as the ultimate military high ground, and are pushing hard to develop weapons to exploit it." Theresa Hitchens is Vice President of the Center for Defense Information, Hitchens wrote the article "U.S. Space Policy: Time to Stop and Think." She said: "Proponents of space weapons
argue that they are needed to protect our satellites in space and our homeland, but this claim is patently false. Rather, U.S. deployment of anti-satellite weapons and offensive space-based
weapons will place U.S. military and civilian satellites, as well as those of other nations, more at risk by creating incentives for others to develop similar weapons."
|
|
|