|
27 May 2005 |
|
H.E. Mr. Sergio de Queiroz Duarte President of the Seventh Review Conference of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons Conference Secretariat United Nations Your Excellency, Thank you for the most cordial reception given the Mayoral Delegation to the Review Conference. Under separate cover, I am transmitting to you the final list of signatories to the International Mayoral Statement. Its 456 signatories were joined by 208 other representatives of municipalities who expressed support for the 2020 Vision Campaign in other forms. It might also interest you to know that the membership of Mayors for Peace has grown from under 600 to over 1000 since our Campaign was launched in November 2003. This surge in membership continues apace. I hope you will excuse me for employing the format of an open letter to communicate with you and all the participants in the Review Conference - governmental and non-governmental. I do not have the slightest doubt that every possible effort has been made by you and the vast majority of the participants to produce a meaningful outcome. All those who labored in good faith have my sincerest thanks for what might well seem a thankless task. I wish you strength and inspiration, if you undertake to submit a presidential statement for acceptance by the Conference. But as I am sure you would agree, a presidential statement is no substitute for a thoroughly considered and accepted Final Document, such as the 2000 Review Conference Final Document. As a veteran of the Conference on Disarmament, you surely had no illusions about the depth of the crisis confronting the nuclear non-proliferation and disarmament agenda. Obstacles that could not be overcome in five years in Geneva were unlikely to yield easily to resolution in four weeks in New York among essentially the same parties. And looking forward, if the heightened stakes at the Review Conference could not elicit more cooperation, what chance is there that the Conference on Disarmament will now rise to its calling? In both Geneva and New York, we have seen countries obstruct work on crucial tasks through crass exploitation of consensus rules. By procedural means, a mere handful of countries
can thwart the will of the great majority of countries. Given what is at stake for humanity, this is intolerable. That a country would then turn around and condemn these
multilateral institutions as ineffective is positively outrageous. We must warn those who behave this way - to paraphrase President Abraham Lincoln: Thank you for the historic role you have shouldered with such patience and perseverance. |
|
|